Some software tools can help publishers of online magazines to check for the originality of articles, and in this capacity tools such as Copyscape are most suitable. They allow an publisher to ascertain if the article attention has been copied or not necessarily and if so to what amount. The tools are wonderful for this purpose.
Of course it is best not to plagiarize, but sometimes this is executed inadvertently, as there is nothing more simple than paraphrasing. Citing an author and giving credit for his/her work has to be done as a matter not surprisingly. A good proofreader editor is more preferable than a software tool for tidying up and preparing your written work before it happens to be submitted.
It happens to be fine to use formatting tools and spell checks, nevertheless if you are writing academic Native english speakers, it is likely that a grammar reading tool will not know how to tackle such writing, as it is not really natural language or at least not the natural words the software tool has been programmed to accept as correct.
You can ask that editor to simply change what is necessary or ask for comments only. A good publisher will be knowledgeable about the discipline you are writing in and often will also be able to check for plagiarism as sometimes it is obvious with the trained eye, as the prepared language changes when you use another person’s words. A software tool may well not be able to pick up on these kinds of changes to your written fashion.
With regard to academic writing, especially dissertations and PhD theses, you require a human proofreader-editor to check your training rather than a software tool. If you have a friend whose written English provides great improvements over yours, then ask them to study your work and make hidden changes to grammar and additionally spelling. You have to have consistent punctuational, either US or British English except for quotations since you cannot change the transliteration in these.
If you think your friends are not proficient enough to help you tackle your writing, then you should consider using the services with professional academic proofreaders together with editors. Proofreaders check for blunders, and may not comment on a person who of your work. They may even if it’s just comment on the amount of padding its full of. That being so you will want to hire the services associated with a proofreader-editor who will comment on unneeded pieces of text and give options as to how your work is usually improved.
Paraphrasing tools are also superior if you are a creative writer stuck for a synonym, but will not be so good if you want to change a major body of text in addition to want a tool to paraphrase it. The end results are usually non-sensical to readers. Writers that do this kind of thing may have an original text, but no one wants to read it.